Corporate Tax
The 50% Ownership Test for Related Parties in the UAE
How the 50% ownership test works under Article 35: direct and indirect holdings, aggregation, and worked examples.
50% ownership test related party uae
Article 35 of Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 treats persons as related parties where one holds 50% or more of the other's ownership interests, counting both direct and indirect holdings. Holdings through subsidiaries and through related family members aggregate toward the 50% line. Two companies majority-held by the same person are related to each other through common control, even with no direct shareholding between them.
Basis: UAE Federal Tax Authority
- Threshold
- 50% or more of ownership interests, direct or indirect
- Article 35, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
- Indirect counts
- Holdings through subsidiaries and chains are included
- Article 35, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
- Sister companies
- Common majority ownership makes companies related to each other
- Article 35, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
# How the 50% test works
The test is mechanical: add up the ownership interests one person holds in another, through every route, and check whether the total reaches 50%. Ownership interests mean shares, units, or any equivalent rights to the capital or profits of the entity. Both voting and economic ownership can matter, depending on the instrument - the question is the interest in the entity, not just the voting power.
Reaching exactly 50% is enough. The test is '50% or more', so a 50/50 joint venture partner is a related party of the venture. Falling just short - say 49% with no other rights - does not trigger this test, though the control test or family links may still apply. Do not treat 49.9% as a safe harbour without checking the other routes in Article 35.
| Holding pattern | Result |
|---|---|
| Direct 60% shareholding | Related - direct majority |
| Direct 50% shareholding | Related - meets the threshold |
| Direct 40% + 15% via subsidiary | Related - 55% aggregated |
| Two 30% holdings by siblings | Related - family aggregation |
| 49% with no control rights | Not related on this test alone |
| 100% of A; A owns 100% of B | Parent related to B - indirect chain |
# Indirect holdings and chains
Indirect ownership is where groups most often miss related parties. A holding company that owns 70% of an intermediate company which owns 70% of an operating company is related to the operating company, even though its economic interest is 49%. Article 35 looks at the chain of ownership interests, not the multiplied economic percentage.
Multiple chains are combined. If a person holds 30% directly and another 25% through a subsidiary, the total is 55% and the test is met. Holdings through nominees, bare trusts, and similar arrangements count where the beneficial ownership sits with the person. Map every chain to its end, because a related party three layers down still triggers Article 34 for its transactions with the UAE entity.
# Common control between sister companies
Two companies with no shareholding in each other are still related where the same person holds 50% or more of each. This is the everyday sister-company case: a holding company owns 100% of company A and 100% of company B, so A and B are related parties and every transaction between them - sales, services, loans, recharges - must be at arm's length.
The same logic applies down the chain. If the holding company owns 60% of A and 55% of B, A and B are related through common control. And where the common owner is a group of related natural persons - say three brothers - their combined holdings establish the common control. The question is always who ultimately sits above both companies, not whether they hold shares in each other.
Partial ownership below 50% on both sides
If the same person holds 40% of A and 40% of B with no control rights, the ownership test alone does not make A and B related. But check the control test: board appointment rights, veto powers, or de facto direction of both companies' policies can still create the relationship. Substance over form decides.
# What to do next
Transfer pricing is one connected system: the arm's length standard, the method you choose, and the documentation you keep all have to tell the same story. Start by mapping every transaction with a related party or connected person, confirm the pricing method for each category, and keep the supporting analysis on file before the corporate tax return is due. The guides below walk through each building block in detail, so work through the ones that match your transactions.
Sources and legal basis
Legislation and decisions1
- Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
Articles relied on1
- Article 35
Authorities, systems and registers1
- UAE Federal Tax Authority
- FTA Transfer Pricing GuideUAE Federal Tax Authority
Rates, thresholds and deadlines change. Every figure above is linked to the authority that publishes it — if the two ever disagree, the authority is right and this page is out of date. Tell us and we will fix it.
Frequently asked questions
Does indirect ownership count toward the 50% test?
Yes. Article 35 expressly covers ownership held directly or indirectly. A parent is related to a company it controls through a chain of subsidiaries, and holdings through multiple chains are aggregated. The test follows the chain of ownership interests rather than the multiplied economic percentage, so a 70%-of-70% chain still counts as a majority link.
What exactly are 'ownership interests'?
Shares, units, membership interests, and equivalent rights in the capital or profits of a juridical person. The concept covers economic ownership, not only voting shares - preference shares and profit-participating instruments can count depending on their terms. When in doubt, treat any interest carrying 50% or more of the economics as meeting the test and document the analysis.
Are sister companies related if the parent owns 51% of each?
Yes. The common-control limb of Article 35 makes them related parties regardless of the absence of any direct shareholding between them. All intercompany transactions between the sisters must meet the arm's length standard, and they count toward disclosure thresholds and local file analysis.
Can holdings of family members be combined for the 50% test?
In effect, yes. Because relatives up to the fourth degree are related parties of each other, holdings spread across family members are viewed together when testing each person's relationship with the company. Three siblings holding 20% each create a related-party relationship between each sibling and the company. Map family holdings as a single block.