Corporate Tax
Small Business Relief vs Normal Tax: AED 420,000 Profit Compared (UAE)
Revenue AED 1.8m, profit AED 420,000: small business relief gives AED 0 tax versus AED 4,050 under normal rules. Full side-by-side computation.
small business relief vs normal tax uae example
A company with AED 1,800,000 of revenue and AED 420,000 of taxable income qualifies for small business relief and pays AED 0 tax, since the relief deems taxable income to be nil. Under normal rules the AED 375,000 threshold would leave AED 45,000 at 9%, a bill of AED 4,050. The relief saves AED 4,050 in this period but must be elected on the return.
Basis: UAE Ministry of Finance
- Revenue
- AED 1,800,000
- Ministerial Decision No. 73 of 2023
- Tax under normal rules
- AED 4,050
- Article 3, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
- Tax with relief elected
- AED 0
- Article 21, Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
# The choice to be made
A small IT services company closes the year with revenue of AED 1,800,000 and taxable income of AED 420,000. Revenue is below the AED 3 million ceiling and was below it in all earlier periods, so the company is eligible for small business relief under Article 21 and Ministerial Decision No. 73 of 2023.
The choice is between electing the relief, which treats taxable income as nil for the period, and filing normally, which taxes the AED 45,000 above the threshold at 9%.
The comparison below shows both computations in full: AED 0 against AED 4,050.
| Route | Taxable income (AED) | Tax (AED) |
|---|---|---|
| Small business relief (elected) | Nil | 0 |
| Normal rules | 420,000 | 4,050 |
# The two computations side by side
Normal route: AED 420,000 minus the AED 375,000 threshold leaves AED 45,000 at 9%, which is AED 4,050 of tax.
Relief route: the election deems taxable income to be nil, so there is nothing for the threshold or the 9% rate to apply to, and the tax is AED 0. Registration and filing remain compulsory.
For the complete rulebook behind these adjustments, see our guide to small business relief.
| Item | Amount (AED) |
|---|---|
| Taxable income | 420,000 |
| Taxable income | 420,000 |
| Less: 0% band | (375,000) |
| Taxed at 9% | 45,000 |
| Tax at 9% | 4,050 |
# Step-by-step computation
Each step below carries its own arithmetic, so the full trail from the starting figure to the tax payable is visible.
-
Test eligibility
Revenue is AED 1,800,000. It is at or below AED 3,000,000 in this and all previous periods, so the relief can be elected.
-
Relief route
Taxable income is deemed to be nil for the period, so corporate tax is AED 0.
-
Normal route
Taxable income of AED 420,000: 9% on AED 45,000 above the threshold gives AED 4,050.
-
Result
Electing the relief saves AED 4,050 this period, subject to the loss-forfeiture trade-off described below.
# What small business relief really gives you
Article 21 allows an eligible taxable person to elect to be treated as not having derived any taxable income for the period. The effect is total: no computation, no 9% rate, no tax. But the relief is an election, not an exemption, and it must be claimed on the corporate tax return for each period it is wanted.
Eligibility turns on revenue, not profit: AED 3 million or less in the current and every previous tax period, measured under the applicable accounting standards. A single period above AED 3 million ends eligibility permanently, even if revenue later falls back. The relief is also closed to qualifying free zone persons, non-residents and members of large multinational groups.
The relief is time-limited to tax periods starting on or after 1 June 2023 and ending on or before 31 December 2026. Businesses should plan their post-2026 compliance on normal rules unless the law is extended.
The hidden cost is forfeiture: a relief period cannot generate carried-forward tax losses or carried-forward disallowed interest. In a profit year that costs nothing, but in a loss year the election destroys a tax asset, which is why the decision must be modelled, not assumed.
The revenue test deserves careful measurement because it uses the accounting standards figure, not a tax-adjusted one. Revenue recognised under IFRS, including the timing of long-term contracts, is what counts. A company near the ceiling should review its revenue recognition policies before year-end, not after.
There is also no partial relief: at AED 3,000,001 the relief is gone entirely, not reduced. This cliff-edge design is deliberate, pushing growing businesses onto the normal rules cleanly rather than through a tapered phase-out that would complicate every computation.
The background rules are set out in our guide to tax loss relief.
# Mistakes that move the answer
Assuming the relief is automatic is the most common error. Without the election on the return, the normal computation applies and the tax is due, even where every condition was met.
Testing profit instead of revenue against the AED 3 million ceiling is the second. A high-margin business with AED 2,600,000 of revenue and AED 950,000 of profit qualifies fully; a loss-maker with AED 3,200,000 of revenue does not qualify at all.
Electing in a loss year without modelling the forfeiture is the third. The relief feels free when tax is nil either way, but the destroyed loss can cost tens of thousands in the following years.
A fourth mistake is ignoring the sunset date. Businesses that build permanent processes around the relief's simplicity will face a compliance cliff for periods ending after 31 December 2026, when full normal-rule computations become mandatory.
Our guide to taxable income covers the underlying provisions in more depth.
# Making the election on the return
The relief is elected on the corporate tax return for the period: the return includes the election, the revenue figure for the period, and the confirmation that revenue was at or below AED 3 million in every previous period. There is no advance approval and no separate filing.
Keep a revenue history file proving the ceiling was met in every period since the regime began, with the financial statements for each year. The FTA can request this evidence, and a gap in the history undermines the current year's election.
Diary the sunset date now. For periods ending after 31 December 2026 the election disappears on current law, so the first normal-rule computation, with full adjustment schedules and transfer pricing awareness, should be prepared in advance rather than under filing-deadline pressure.
Finally, note the election is strictly per period: last year's election does not carry forward, and each year's return makes its own claim. A standing diary entry to model the election during year-end close prevents the default from becoming an accidental normal filing.
# The answer at a glance
This page works one computation end to end: the scenario sets out the starting figures, the adjustments section applies each tax correction with its article reference, and the step-by-step section shows every line of arithmetic. The key figures are collected here for quick reference.
Use this page as a template by replacing the scenario's numbers with your own while keeping the same adjustment logic: the method, the article references and the order of operations transfer directly to any similar computation.
When you adapt the template, re-check each adjustment against the current facts rather than copying the amounts. A fine that was non-deductible here might be breach-of-contract compensation there; entertainment is always halved but only genuine client entertainment belongs in that line; and exempt income must meet its article's conditions in your period, not just resemble last year's.
Pay particular attention to the order of operations when you reuse the method. Adjustments come first to reach taxable income, then loss relief and the interest limitation apply to that figure, and only then do the 0% and 9% rate bands divide it. Reordering these layers is the fastest way to turn a right method into a wrong answer.
Finally, keep the evidence behind every figure you substitute. The FTA tests computations from the documents outward: invoices behind expenses, dividend vouchers behind exempt income, valuations behind market-value adjustments, and assessments behind foreign tax credits. A template with good numbers and no evidence is only half a return.
| Figure | Value |
|---|---|
| Revenue | AED 1,800,000 |
| Tax under normal rules | AED 4,050 |
| Tax with relief elected | AED 0 |
Sources and legal basis
Legislation and decisions2
- Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022
- Ministerial Decision No. 73 of 2023
Authorities, systems and registers1
Terms used2
- Small Business Relief
- Small Business Relief
- Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on the Taxation of Corporations and Businesses (consolidated English text)UAE Ministry of Finance
- UAE Federal Tax Authority: corporate tax guidance and clarificationsUAE Federal Tax Authority
Rates, thresholds and deadlines change. Every figure above is linked to the authority that publishes it — if the two ever disagree, the authority is right and this page is out of date. Tell us and we will fix it.
Frequently asked questions
Is small business relief automatic for small companies?
No. It must be elected on the corporate tax return for the period, and the company must still register and file. A company that forgets the election is taxed under the normal rules, here AED 4,050, even though it qualified for AED 0.
Does the relief change the revenue test for next year?
No, but next year's eligibility still requires revenue of AED 3 million or less in every period including this one. One year above AED 3 million ends eligibility permanently, so growth planning should watch the ceiling.
Must a company register and file if it will elect the relief?
Yes. Registration, return filing and record-keeping apply to every taxable person, including those electing the relief. The election is made on the filed return; there is no separate application and no way to claim it without filing.
Can artificial separation keep a business under AED 3 million?
No. Splitting a business artificially to stay under the ceiling is caught by the general anti-abuse rule in Article 50, and the FTA can disregard the arrangement. Genuine commercial structuring is fine; contrived fragmentation is not.