Penalties & Disputes
Tax Assessment Review Under Article 28
The Article 28 tax assessment review: when to use it, how to file, the 40-day clocks, and its relationship with reconsideration.
article 28 assessment review
Article 28 lets you ask the FTA to review a tax assessment or part of it (and related penalties) within 40 business days of notification, with reasons specified. The FTA decides within 40 business days and notifies within 5. You cannot run review and reconsideration in parallel on the same assessment — but the review decision can go to reconsideration under Article 29.
Basis: Federal Tax Authority, as published by the Ministry of Finance
- Review window
- 40 business days from assessment notification
- Article 28(2), FDL 28/2022
- Sequel
- Review decision → reconsideration (40 BD)
- Article 28(4), FDL 28/2022
# The purpose-built assessment challenge
Article 28 is the Tax Procedures Law's dedicated assessment-review mechanism: 'a Person may submit a request to the Authority to review a Tax Assessment or part thereof and any related Administrative Penalties.' Where reconsideration challenges decisions broadly, review targets the assessment's figures specifically — making it the natural rung for estimated assessments, computation disputes, and assessments whose numbers (rather than legal character) are wrong.
This topic sits inside the UAE's four-stage dispute ladder: tax assessment review (Article 28, 40 business days), reconsideration (Article 29, 40 business days), TDRC objection (Article 32, 40 business days with the connected tax paid in full), and court appeal (Article 36, 40 business days with 50% of penalties secured). Each stage is a precondition for the next — you cannot skip a rung, and each has its own clock.
# How the review works
Request within 40 business days of notification of the assessment and related penalties, specifying the reasons, in the form and manner the Authority specifies (Article 28(2), (6)). The Authority reviews and issues its decision within 40 business days of receiving the request, informing you within 5 business days of issuance (Article 28(3)). Then Article 28(4): you may submit a reconsideration request under Article 29 against the review decision within 40 business days of notification — or of the expiration of the decision timeframe. The review is thus both a remedy and a gateway: it can resolve the figures, and where it does not, it feeds the reconsideration.
The mutual-exclusion rule
Article 28(5): no review request where a reconsideration request has already been filed on the assessment — and Article 29(3) bars the reverse. The choice is irrevocable in practice. Pure figure disputes (especially estimates) go to review; mixed figure-and-law disputes usually go to reconsideration for its wider scope. Choose on advice before either clock runs out.
# Using review strategically
Review's strength is focus: the Authority re-examines the assessment's construction — the estimate's methodology, the computation's inputs, the figures' support. Lead with the side-by-side schedule (assessment vs actuals) and the methodology attack; these are review's native language. The review decision, with its stated reasoning, then becomes the reconsideration's target where needed — a two-step that gives the figures two hearings. And where the Authority lets the 40-day decision timeframe expire, Article 28(4)'s 'expiration of the timeframe' language provides the path onward without waiting indefinitely.
Review and the rest of the ladder
Review sits at the ladder's foot: review → reconsideration (of the review decision) → TDRC objection → court appeal. Each transition has its 40-day clock. The review is the only rung that cannot be skipped to (it must come before reconsideration on the same assessment) and the only one whose decision expressly feeds the next — design the sequence deliberately from the start.
# Procedure and timelines
Every stage runs on business days — Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays and UAE public holidays do not count — and every clock starts on notification, not on the date printed on the letter. Diary the notification date the day it arrives: screenshot the EmaraTax timestamp or keep the delivery proof. File at the 10-day mark, never on the deadline; portal outages on the final day are your problem, not the FTA's.
The FTA decides reconsideration and assessment-review requests within 40 business days and notifies within 5. The TDRC decides objections within 20 business days and notifies within 5, extendable by up to 60 business days where the case needs it. Miss a filing window and the request is inadmissible — the merits are never heard, and the courts have no power to extend these statutory windows.
| Stage | Your deadline | Authority deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Tax assessment review (Article 28) | 40 business days from notification of the assessment | FTA decides in 40 business days, notifies in 5 |
| Reconsideration (Article 29) | 40 business days from notification of the decision | FTA decides in 40 business days, notifies in 5 |
| TDRC objection (Article 32) | 40 business days from notification of the reconsideration decision; tax must be paid in full | Committee decides in 20 business days, notifies in 5 |
| Court appeal (Article 36) | 40 business days from notification of the Committee decision; 50% of penalties secured | Court timetable applies |
# Next steps
For assessment-figure disputes, Article 28 review is the purpose-built tool: 40 days to request, 40+5 for the decision, with reconsideration as the sequel. File it with the figures attacked precisely, diary the sequel's clock from the decision, and let the review do what it was designed for — or fail informatively, so the reconsideration knows exactly what to answer.
If the deadline is close or the amount is large, get help before you file. Call +971 58 541 4616, message us on WhatsApp at https://wa.me/971585414616, email info@taxadvisors.ae, or use the contact form at /contact/.
# Mistakes that lose tax assessment review under article 28 cases
The patterns below recur across UAE tax disputes. Avoiding them is worth more than any single clever argument. Review this list before filing at each rung — the mistakes compound up the ladder, and a file that avoids all four starts every forum from strength:
Missing the window
The most common and most final mistake. Every rung of the ladder — assessment review, reconsideration, TDRC objection, court appeal — runs on 40 business days from notification, and a late filing is inadmissible with no power to extend. Diary the notification date the day it arrives, count business days on a calendar excluding weekends and UAE public holidays, and file at the 10-day mark. Portal outages on the final day are your problem.
Arguing the wrong forum's case
Each forum answers a different question. Reconsideration asks the FTA to correct its own decision; the TDRC gives an independent committee's view; the court applies litigation standards. A file that copy-pastes the same grounds up the ladder underperforms at every rung. Restructure the arguments for each forum: answer the previous decision's stated reasons, lead with what that forum is best placed to grant, and drop what it has already rejected.
Evidence that does not prove
Assertions without documents, reconstructions presented as records, and screenshots without dates or context — reviewers discount all of them. Build every ground as proposition plus contemporaneous proof: EmaraTax receipts, bank value dates, dated contracts, third-party confirmations. One indexed bundle, tabs matching the numbered grounds, key exhibits translated into Arabic. The file that can be verified in fifteen minutes wins.
Ignoring the economics
Not every winnable point is worth winning. Weigh the amount at stake against the cost of each rung — including the tax-paid condition for the TDRC and the 50%-of-penalties security for court — and against management time. Where the economics turn, settle, seek instalments under Article 50, or narrow the dispute to the points that pay. Persistence is a virtue only while it pays; knowing when to stop is part of running a dispute well.
Treating the dispute as a single event
A tax dispute is a campaign across up to four forums, not a single filing. Businesses that treat reconsideration as the whole case — holding back evidence for later, or failing to diary the next rung's deadline — arrive at the TDRC or court unprepared. From day one, plan the full ladder: what each forum needs, what each costs, and where you would stop. The file should be built once, to litigation standard, and then tightened — not reinvented — at each stage. Get these five disciplines right and the merits get the hearing they deserve.
Sources and legal basis
Legislation and decisions3
- Federal Decree-Law No. 28 of 2022 on Tax Procedures
- Federal Decree-Law No. 17 of 2025
- Cabinet Decision No. 74 of 2023 (Executive Regulation of the Tax Procedures Law)
Authorities, systems and registers2
- Federal Tax Authority (FTA)
- EmaraTax
Terms used1
- Tax Disputes Resolution Committee (TDRC)
- Federal Decree-Law No. 28 of 2022 on Tax Procedures and its amendments, consolidated 3 December 2025Federal Tax Authority, as published by the Ministry of Finance
- Reconsideration Request service card (fee, EmaraTax path, response time; page last updated 19 August 2026)Federal Tax Authority
Rates, thresholds and deadlines change. Every figure above is linked to the authority that publishes it — if the two ever disagree, the authority is right and this page is out of date. Tell us and we will fix it.
Frequently asked questions
What can I challenge under Article 28?
A tax assessment or part of it, and any related administrative penalties — the figures and their construction. Broader legal challenges to decisions fit Article 29 reconsideration better. The review's scope is the assessment; use it where the numbers are the quarrel.
How is Article 28 different from reconsideration?
Review targets the assessment's figures specifically; reconsideration challenges any decision broadly. Both give 40 business days to file and 40+5 for the FTA to decide — but they cannot run in parallel on the same assessment, and the review decision can subsequently go to reconsideration.
What if the FTA does not decide my review?
Article 28(4) expressly allows the reconsideration sequel within 40 business days of notification 'or the expiration of the timeframe' for the review decision — the expiry itself can trigger the next step. Document the filing, the clock, and the follow-ups, then proceed on advice.
Is review mandatory before reconsideration?
No — you may go straight to reconsideration where that fits better. Review is an option, not a prerequisite. But once you choose review on an assessment, reconsideration on the same assessment must wait for the review decision (Article 28(4)) rather than running in parallel.